Messages posted by: OneBlackbird

Pat1196 wrote:I have not "dumped" the modding community. I've simply stated that at this time, I seek no interest in involving them with this effort.

You sound just like John Riccitiello recovering from a trip-up. Congratulations.

Maybe it's time to follow his lead and resign.

Pat1196 wrote:Chief-Director: Pat1196 (myself)

There's nothing to explain. You are bombastic in all your posts, dump the mod community overboard because you "don't like them" and act like making some adventures in Spore has turned you into a celebrity.

I'm just going to come out and say it: Pat1196, whoever he is, is bad at running this. He's like the CEO of the company who doesn't know he's putting his foot in his mouth half the time and makes bad PR for everyone.

Tough love is best love. ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

Your logic is flawed and Didzo is correct. Your statement equates shrinking to obsolete and your follow-up is just to add the word "gradually" to it. You are still saying the same thing. You just added an extra word. You could've said "quickly" and it wouldn't change the meaning, only the timeframe.

If you really wanted to make a point about the possible vestigial nature of the appendix, you could've taken all of five seconds on Wikipedia and followed a link to an actual research paper.

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ar.21357/abstract;jsessionid=468874E9D03EA4A39F6A88F3053BA5EE.d02t01

Oh no. Where did that come from? I think it's trying to say something. What's that? The appendix may hold certain important gastrointestinal flora, but is less useful in developed countries? Your point is valid, but how you arrived there is not. You may as well have said "Elephants are getting smaller; that means they are gradually becoming obsolete."

Oh, Didzo's point is also valid. However, he arrived there with facts.

In the future, please look before you leap.

I don't even.

A nutritional scientist once told me evolution wasn't true. He was a scientist. ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

Peekarica wrote:my film Spore Effect to him. It should give him a sort of vision what players want for a new Spore game. See Shores of Hazeron as example.

I definitely want a Mass Effect/Spore mash-up trainwreck of a game. Oh boy, I can't wait.

Good thing the developers don't really care about what you think.

Pat1196 wrote:This is why our community is dying.

That's all I can say about this. Just lol.

DOGC_Kyle wrote:though if they did keep it I would recommend "Spore Universe".

I'll throw that on the idea pile.

I spend my time off Spore.

CloudyVision wrote:Trying my best to understand Blackbird's poem. I know he means the chatroll is where the activity has disappeared to, but the rest is gibberish.

It's coming.
It's coming.
It's coming.

Semagodo wrote:I think Spore isn't a very "movieable" game, becaus it doesn't have specific characters or a specific plot.

Hollywood thinks "money" is a specific enough character in all its films.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1440129/?ref_=sr_1

CloudyVision wrote:Nope, not at all. Where has the activity in this place disappeared to?

You can chat if you want to
You can leave forums behind
'Cause there's no post
And if there's no post
Well, there's no post this time