opticbronze wrote:one black bird can you some how hide that picher it is very frekey

He probably could if you would spell words correctly, and use capitals where they are to be used.

Sorry Alpha989 I am still not good at this.

opticbronze wrote:Sorry Alpha989 I am still not good at this.

It's okay, just a small tip, when typing/saying "I am" you can just use "I'm".

Kind of defeats the purpose of my post, but OK. Picture hidden.

OneBlackbird wrote:

ZhaoYun9 wrote:I truthfully rather live at mcmurdo station (antarctica)

Don't forget to bring the flamethrowers and testing kits.

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-2-pYnhjxJBE/TiNft5WjGPI/AAAAAAAAAlk/r9YPA5Nh86U/s1600/Thing+6.jpg

I will make sure to hunt down Macready and his friend...

sporemasterblackbird wrote: Kind of defeats the purpose of my post, but OK. Picture hidden.

thank you SMblack bird

Antarctica is one of the few international co-operative efforts. But to be honest, I'd rather they either split it out equally, or manage it as the world, rather than several national territories.

But it depends what floats people's boat. We will not, I repeat, not, under any circumstances, blow it like we did with the inhabited continents.

Sure, it's your quarter of the boat & you can do what you want with it (including sawing it off from the rest: remember that it's a boat, of course), but Antarctica's a world resource. We're doing reasonably well as it is, but we can do better.

cpelite wrote:Antarctica is one of the few international co-operative efforts. But to be honest, I'd rather they either split it out equally, or manage it as the world, rather than several national territories.

But it depends what floats people's boat. We will not, I repeat, not, under any circumstances, blow it like we did with the inhabited continents.

Sure, it's your quarter of the boat & you can do what you want with it (including sawing it off from the rest: remember that it's a boat, of course), but Antarctica's a world resource. We're doing reasonably well as it is, but we can do better.

TBH I personally wanted full control of that region since 2002

The ocean's counterargument:

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=north-carolina-sea-level-rises-desipte-senators

I laughed so hard when I read that.
Someone should make a comic out of it.

IsakTheWriter wrote:I laughed so hard when I read that.
Someone should make a comic out of it.

xkcd == perfect candidate!

Ash got 100th post but didn't even know it.

Well I claim 100 because he won't. Anyway on topicness...

This made me laugh.

So hard.

murdick wrote:Ash got 100th post but didn't even know it.

Well I claim 100 because he won't. Anyway on topicness...

This made me laugh.

So hard.

But yours is obviously no. 101 then, right?

Eh. It's crazy what they'll try to make into law in recent times. At least we blocked SOPA, but ACTA slipped through.
Now, banning sea level rise (of sorts)? That's new.

That's amazingly dumb. Who are they going to charge anyway...oh wait. I have an idea...



Guys, I'm going to cure cancer!!!

I'm in the drafting stage right now, but when I'm finished cancer will be illegal.

/northcarolinalogic

Darkhole54321 wrote:Guys, I'm going to cure cancer!!!

I'm in the drafting stage right now, but when I'm finished cancer will be illegal.

/northcarolinalogic